'08 Starks vs '11 Oliver: A Statistical Analysis
I was under the impression that everyone loved BO, the bright spot in our otherwise dark season. BO finished as the #13 running back in the nation, in 12 games, 2nd in the MAC to Bernard Pierce. With graduation and the NFL draft, 5 of the top 13 backs will not return, so theoretically, we will have the nation's #8 back next year and the #1 back in the MAC.
However I learned Bull Run Nation is split on BO, many believing his numbers were inflated by cupcake opponents, and his massive 306 carries. The Gold standard of Buffalo running backs, before this year, was James Starks and his performance during the championship year of 2008. That year, Starks not only finished #17 in the nation, he did so in dramatic fashion; breaking off long runs and ending OT games with flair.
So how do BO '11 and Starks '08 compare. In my analysis, I looked at the yards per carry of each back to remove inflated numbers based on increased carries. I then found the average yards per carry allowed for the (non QB) feature back of each team BO and Starks faced.
The results after the jump.

We'll analyze 5 categories:
1) Number of times the RB exceeded their Opponents Average YPC (Columns BO +/- and Starks +/-)
2) Number of times the RB was more than 1 YPC below their Opponents Average YPC (+/-Columns)
3) Opponents Run Defense (Average of OPP YPC column)
4) Big games (Average +/- in big games)
5) X-Factors
|
|
BO Attempt | BO Yards | BO YPC | BO +/- | Opp Att | Opp Yards | Opp YPC |
| Stony | 15 | 126 | 8.40 | 4.53 | 172 | 666 | 3.87 |
| Eastern Mich | 18 | 133 | 7.39 | 3.47 | 143 | 561 | 3.92 |
| Akron | 29 | 235 | 8.10 | 2.57 | 205 | 1135 | 5.54 |
| Ohio | 34 | 179 | 5.26 | 1.02 | 228 | 968 | 4.25 |
| UConn | 23 | 84 | 3.65 | -0.14 | 146 | 554 | 3.79 |
| NIU | 28 | 112 | 4.00 | -0.48 | 218 | 977 | 4.48 |
| Ball St | 27 | 118 | 4.37 | -0.71 | 208 | 1056 | 5.08 |
| Pitt | 35 | 114 | 3.26 | -0.89 | 224 | 928 | 4.14 |
| Tenn | 18 | 58 | 3.22 | -1.70 | 192 | 945 | 4.92 |
| BGSU | 34 | 127 | 3.74 | -2.14 | 178 | 1045 | 5.87 |
| Temple | 21 | 62 | 2.95 | -2.38 | 178 | 950 | 5.34 |
| Miami | 24 | 47 | 1.96 | -2.43 | 181 | 794 | 4.39 |
|
|
|||||||
|
|
Starks Attempt | Starks Yards | Starks YPC | Starks +/- | Opp Att | Opp Yards | Opp YPC |
| Ohio | 30 | 185 | 6.17 | 1.63 | 178 | 808 | 4.54 |
| Kent State | 24 | 136 | 5.67 | 0.86 | 179 | 860 | 4.80 |
| Miami | 26 | 177 | 6.81 | 0.51 | 195 | 1229 | 6.30 |
| Pitt | 20 | 97 | 4.85 | 0.37 | 217 | 972 | 4.48 |
| Western Mich | 28 | 125 | 4.46 | 0.30 | 196 | 817 | 4.17 |
| UTEP | 31 | 179 | 5.77 | -0.70 | 202 | 1307 | 6.47 |
| Akron | 37 | 151 | 4.08 | -0.91 | 206 | 1028 | 4.99 |
| Central Mich | 22 | 94 | 4.27 | -0.94 | 177 | 922 | 5.21 |
| BGSU | 14 | 62 | 4.43 | -1.05 | 201 | 1102 | 5.48 |
| Ball State | 19 | 82 | 4.32 | -1.21 | 173 | 956 | 5.53 |
| UConn | 13 | 25 | 1.92 | -2.53 | 174 | 774 | 4.45 |
| Temple | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | -2.70 | 221 | 1149 | 5.20 |
1) Number of times the running back exceeded their opponents YPC
BO's YPC exceeded his opponent's average 4 times, (Stony Brook, Eastern Michigan, Akron and Ohio).
Starks' YPC exceeded his opponent's average 5 times, (Ohio, Kent St, Miami, Pitt and Western Mich).
Advantage: STARKS
2) Number of times the running back was more than 1 YPC below their opponent's average
BO 4 times (Tennessee, BGSU, Temple, Miami).
Starks 4 times (BGSU, Ball State, UConn, Temple).
Advantage: PUSH
3) Difficulty of opponents
BO: Opponent's average YPC allowed: 4.63, (4.70 not counting Stony Brook)
Starks: Opponent's average YPC allowed: 5.13
Advantage: BO
4) Big games
BO's average performance in the four biggest games of '11: .89 YPC under the opponent's average allowed.
(NIU (eventual mac champs), Temple (MAC East Powerhouse/rivals), Ohio (MAC East Champs), Tennessee (Toughest Non-Conference Game))
Starks' average performance in the four biggest games of '08: 1.1 YPC under the opponent's average allowed.
(Pittsburgh (Toughest Non-Conference Game), Bowling Green (MAC East Clincher), Ball State (MAC Champ game), UConn (International Bowl))
BO's UB was 1-3 in his big games, Starks' UB was 2-2 in his big games.
Advantage: PUSH
5) X-Factors
Durability:
Starks missed 2 games due to injury (Missouri, Army).
BO missed no games and was 7th in the nation in number of carries.
Efficiency:
BO's YPC for the season was 4.56, (4.36 minus the Stony Brook game)
Starks' YPC for the season was 4.9.
Impact:
When Starks' YPC exceeded the opponent's average allowed, UB went 2-3, UB went 5-2 when Starks failed to meet or exceed the opponent's average YPC allowed.
When BO's YPC exceeded the opponent's average allowed, UB went 3-1, when he failed, UB went 0-8.
Advantage: BO
Overall Best Season: BO (2-1-2)
Overall both backs put up big numbers but did not consistently outperform the average of the defense's they faced. Starks had better numbers, but the defenses he faced were not as adept at stoping the run. In 2008, many of our opponents faced Donald Brown (2083 yards), MiQuale Lewis (1736 yards), and Shady McCoy (1488 yards), and those backs put up bigger numbers than Starks.
The big components in favor of BO, was our record when BO exceeded the YPC allowed by opponents, and BO slightly outperformed Starks in "Big Games."
You could argue that the biggest X-factor is a championship. Starks delivered one, and that for some fans, could pull Starks even or ahead of BO for best Rushing season. However looking at yards per carry vs the average YPC of their opponents, BO in my interpretation put in a better season.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Still have to go with Jones
With Oliver it depends. He got better at reading the line and waiting for the holes to open up it was night and day from the early weeks
Was the the quality of his opponents or just him maturing?
Great article!
Love the breakdown and I still not sure why fans have called for more carries for another back.
I think it's an 'eggs in the basket thing'
Even though Starks was ‘the guy’ look how much work Brandon Thermilus got..
by Tim Riordan on Jan 20, 2012 11:07 AM EST up reply actions
I was worried about durability
I thought BO would breakdown by game 8 from overuse,
but he survived.
also I liked Gill, he showed good spark in 2009, and I hate to see a player get ignored, by a new coaching staff, (only 19 carries in 2011)…but I can only hope, it’s Gill not giving his all in practice rather than a case of the new coach just using “his guy”
Last Bull Out
by bull_trojan on Jan 20, 2012 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Best RB
What about the great Alan “Pops” Bell?
by Bull of all Bulls on Jan 20, 2012 4:53 PM EST reply actions
I think Alan Bell might be the next back in, along with Wille Evans, and I have a soft spot for Dave Dawson
But those backs had more of a consistently good career, versus the extraordinary season.
But if we had a debate on the best “All Purpose” Bull, AB would probably be at the top of my list.
Last Bull Out
Oliver does not deserve it quite yet
He maybe the best back to ever come out of UB but Starks was special. I do have to give credit how tough Bo is. One of the bright spots to look forward to next year.

by 









